Must Beliefs and Evidence Agree? (häftad, eng)
Must Beliefs and Evidence Agree? (häftad, eng)
Gästpris:
Ditt medlemspris:
480 kr
554 kr
Kampanjpris! (-1%)
Kampanjpris! (-14%)
- Inköpspriser för medlemmar (Logga in)
- Frakt från 0 kr
- 14 dagars öppet köp
Frågor? Starta chatt
Should our beliefs be proportioned to our evidence? Are we doing something wrong in believing with little or no evidence? And may our beliefs be based partly or wholly on moral or practical considerations? These questions are harder than you think. Scott Stapleford and Elizabeth Jackson agree on the priority of evidence, but they differ on the degree of permissible slack and the relevance of other considerations.
In this lively epistemological debate, Stapleford takes a hard line, defending the extremist view that any discrepancy between what we believe and what our evidence supports is an error that should be corrected. In the economy of our beliefs, evidence alone has a normative grip.
Jackson is more forgiving. While evidence regulates belief, its authority is not complete. She takes a more liberal perspective that accords non-evidential factors a lawful role in delimiting the class of permissible beliefs. With echoes of the famous 19th century dispute between the mathematician William Clifford and the psychologist William James, the Stapleford–Jackson debate feels particularly relevant in a time when disagreement runs uncomfortably hot and evidence is treated with contempt.
This debate will tempt—and gently instruct—anyone who has ever asked themselves: Can’t I just believe what I want?Key FeaturesIncludes accessible discussions of evidence, evidentialism, transparency, epistemic value monism, the aim of belief, permissivism, encroachment, practical reasons for belief, epistemic obligations, Pascal’s wager, and much more.
Is highly readable, with clear language and an easy-to-follow format. Includes boxed summaries at the end of each section and partitioned expansions of key ideas that supplement the main lines of reasoning.
In this lively epistemological debate, Stapleford takes a hard line, defending the extremist view that any discrepancy between what we believe and what our evidence supports is an error that should be corrected. In the economy of our beliefs, evidence alone has a normative grip.
Jackson is more forgiving. While evidence regulates belief, its authority is not complete. She takes a more liberal perspective that accords non-evidential factors a lawful role in delimiting the class of permissible beliefs. With echoes of the famous 19th century dispute between the mathematician William Clifford and the psychologist William James, the Stapleford–Jackson debate feels particularly relevant in a time when disagreement runs uncomfortably hot and evidence is treated with contempt.
This debate will tempt—and gently instruct—anyone who has ever asked themselves: Can’t I just believe what I want?Key FeaturesIncludes accessible discussions of evidence, evidentialism, transparency, epistemic value monism, the aim of belief, permissivism, encroachment, practical reasons for belief, epistemic obligations, Pascal’s wager, and much more.
Is highly readable, with clear language and an easy-to-follow format. Includes boxed summaries at the end of each section and partitioned expansions of key ideas that supplement the main lines of reasoning.
| Format | Häftad |
| Omfång | 222 sidor |
| Språk | Engelska |
| Förlag | Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Utgivningsdatum | 2025-12-04 |
| ISBN | 9780367468248 |
Artikelnummer
3873624
EAN
9780367468248
Leverans:
Denna produkt skickas från oss inom 6 - 7 vardagar. I kassan väljer du om du vill få leverans med Budbee, Airmee, Best Transport, Early Bird, Postnord eller DB Schenker. Vissa speditörer har vikt- eller storleksbegränsningar och kan av den anledningen saknas som alternativ i kassan om du handlar många eller väldigt stora produkter.Fri retur:
För medlemmar gäller fri retur och 14 dagars full returrätt från den dagen du tar emot din leverans. För övriga kostar retur från 49 kr.Undantag för retur- och ångerrätt:
Dessa är exempel på varor som inte omfattas av retur- eller ångerrätt. Observera att det kan finnas andra undantag som inte listas här.- Använda, skadade och/eller inkompletta produkter
- Dagligvaror (livsmedel, läkemedel, nikotinprodukter)
- Hygienartiklar & kroppsnära produkter (rakapparater, in ear-hörlurar, aktivitetsklockor)
- Intimprodukter (menskoppar, kondomer och glidmedel)
- Kosmetikprodukter (inkl. hår- och hudvårdsprodukter, parfymer, etc.)
- Underkläder (inkl. badkläder, underställ och strumpor)
- Ljud- & bildupptagningar, spel/program (om förseglingen brutits eller licensnyckeln erhållits.)
- Teknikprodukter om försegling brutits eller programvara har installerats (mobiltelefoner, surfplattor, laptops, etc.)
- Gratisprodukter
Om du är osäker på om en produkt omfattas av ångerrätt kan du alltid kontakta vår kundtjänst på info@buyersclub.se, så hjälper vi dig gärna!
Leveranser:
